If you cared about saving lives, you would not ignore treatment

Governor Ron DeSantis’s (R) administration slammed criticism from White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki after she suggested that DeSantis had not done enough to promote vaccines against the Chinese coronavirus – as he has fought for freedom of choice as well as life-saving treatment. .

During Thursday’s press conference, Psaki defended the Biden administration’s approach to bringing the pandemic under control “through the lens of justice” and rejected criticism from the Florida governor.

“I would say that it is quite rich to come from Governor DeSantis, as he is a person who has spoken out, not exactly advocating for people in his state to be vaccinated,” she said, adding:

What we know is the way people can be protected, the way life can be saved. And if he wants to be a constructive part of this process, then perhaps he should encourage what scientists say is the best way to save lives, prevent and reduce hospitalization, and that is to get vaccinated and be boosted.

Her remarks prompted a swift response from DeSanti press secretary Christina Pushaw, who reminded the Biden administration that Florida actually has a higher-than-average vaccination rate. In addition, the vaccination rate in Miami-Dade County, a hotspot for the omicron variant, is 93 percent vaccinated.

“Florida has a higher than average vaccination rate, and Miami-Dade County (the most important omicron hotspot in Florida) is 93% vaccinated – far higher than mandated dystopia NYC. People are still getting sick,” Pushaw said, telling Psaki, “ie.If you cared about saving lives – you would not ignore treatment “:

This week, DeSantis criticized the federal government for turning the entire market into a corner for life-saving coronavirus treatment, though he noted that HHS recently “decided to reverse the course and they will send these treatments” to states.

He noted, however, that Florida is “past a point now that we are able to get it directly from any of these companies” thanks to the federal government’s exclusive agreements.

Give a Comment