Britney Spears may be free of the restrictive conservatory that ruled her life for 13 years, however Poisonous the singer’s ongoing fight with her father is going to a whole different level.
At a court hearing Wednesday in Los Angeles Superior Court, Judge Brenda Penny agreed with lawyers on both sides that a hearing is needed to determine whether Jamie Spears spied on his daughter in her bedroom and elsewhere, and whether he looted the one-time princess. of Pop’s fortune of many millions of dollars.
A sort of mini-lawsuit seems to start on July 27th.
Just over two months after Penny pulled the plug on the controversial conservatory, Wednesday’s lengthy and short-lived blackout-plagued hearing in downtown Los Angeles follows direct cases that repeat a seemingly consistent campaign of lining its own pockets and monitoring the elder. Spear.
“During his tenure as conservator, Mr Spears used his role as conservator to enrich himself and those who were loyal or helpful to him, often at the expense and against his own daughter’s best interests, whose assets, welfare and best interests he was presumed to protect, ”says a former FBI agent hired by Britney Spears ‘lawyer Matthew Rosengart to investigate Jamie Spears’ control over his offspring’s career and more than $ 60 million in property (read the statement here).
“In addition to the financial misconduct, Mr. Spears had actual and apparent conflicts of interest in violation of industry norms and the rules of a conservator’s conduct, and he also engaged in and instructed others to engage in unscrupulous violations of Ms. Spears’ privacy and civil liberties. , which also implies federal or state criminal violations of the law, ”said Sherine Ebadi, now Kroll Associates Inc’s associate CEO, in a statement submitted to the case last week.
In addition to pitching himself to a cooking show and snatching $ 6.3 million from his daughter’s property and accounts, Elder Spears also “self-traded,” according to Ebadi. After already approving “the cost of more than $ 30 million in fees to be paid by the estate to dozens of firms between 2008 and 2020,” Jamie Spears requested the court to have Britney Spears pay her current attorney’s fees – which is a result of her struggle to detach herself from him.
Right now, that case and the efforts of others to get money out of the estate are being pushed to that evidentiary hearing this summer. Expected to last several days, the mini-trial will also address allegations that Jamie Spears used security firm Black Box to illegally spy on his daughter Britney.
Today, the older Spears’ new attorney, Alex Weingarten, said that the alleged extensive surveillance of the younger Spears in her home, on her various phones and other devices, and elsewhere “did not happen.” First reported by New York Times on tap and in FX on Hulu’s Directed by Britney Spears in September last year, the allegations have long been rejected by the older Spears, even when a former Black Box employee emerged as a whistleblower.
Now, those denials have not passed at least one test, with perhaps more to go to court.
“After the publication of these troubling allegations, I personally debriefed and interviewed the whistleblower, Alex Vlasov, at the Bel Air Hotel in Los Angeles under the direction of Ms. Spears’ attorney, and I confirmed Times‘s reporting on Mr. Spears’ extensive surveillance efforts, including by Ms. Spears’ lawyer-client communication and private conversations in her bedroom, “said ex-G woman Ebadi in her 27-page statement at the end of last week,” Based on my training and experience, including as an FBI special agent, and after debriefing and interviewing hundreds of people and witnesses, I concluded that Mr. Vlasov was extremely credible, “she concluded.
As for Britney Spears herself – the singer was silent but gripping in a post on social media this afternoon.
It comes, of course, after a very public battle in the past week with his sister Jamie Lynn over the latter’s allegedly revealing memories and after getting Greenberg Traurig LLP’s Rosengart to send a termination-and-waiver letter. So what more is there to say?
Disclaimers for mcutimes.com
All the information on this website – https://mcutimes.com – is published in good faith and for general information purposes only. mcutimes.com does not make any warranties about the completeness, reliability, and accuracy of this information. Any action you take upon the information you find on this website (mcutimes.com), is strictly at your own risk. mcutimes.com will not be liable for any losses and/or damages in connection with the use of our website.