Republican-led states are moving on to Texas-style Pro-Life measures

A lawmaker in the state of Oklahoma plans to introduce a Texas-style pro-life law that will allow individuals to sue doctors who perform abortions that are not supposed to save the mother’s life.

Rep. Sean Roberts (R-OK) said in a press release:

The pro-life citizens of Oklahoma should have the ability to help hold these physicians accountable. Individual citizens are an extremely important part of ensuring that we protect the lives of the unborn. This legislation implements principles and I will fight extremely hard to get it passed during the next session.

Like TulsaWorld reported Last week, Roberts said he was concerned about the number of women coming from Texas to Oklahoma to have abortions since the enactment of the Texas Heartbeat Act, Senate Bill 8.

“This legislation is critical and must be passed in this session to stem the flow of Texans seeking abortion in our state,” Roberts said.

But if the US Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a challenge to a Mississippi law restricting abortion, Oklahoma could return to a state law banning all abortions except to save the mother’s life.

Oklahoma is one of many Republican-led states seeking to reflect the basic principles of the Texas Heartbeat Act, as the U.S. Supreme Court allowed Texas law to remain in force while lawsuits against it continue.

Last week, during her State of the State speech, South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem (R) said called at her Legislative Assembly to pass a law banning abortion once a fetal heartbeat has been detected.

Florida Rep. Anthony Sabatini (R) became the first legislator in Sunshine State to publicly announce that he would introduce a heartbeat bill when the new legislative session began in January 2022.

Arizona Heartbeat Act var introduced this week to the state legislature.

The bill would prohibit a physician from “intentionally performing or inducing an abortion on a pregnant woman if the physician discovers a fetal heartbeat for the unborn child.”

In addition, the bill includes a unique enforcement mechanism similar to that of Texas law, whereby any private citizen can file a civil lawsuit against an abortion provider or any other person who “helps or promotes” a “criminal abortion.”

“Statutory damages amounting to $ 10,000 or more for each abortion performed or induced by the defendant in violation of Section 36, Chapter 23, Article 3 and for any abortion performed or induced in violation of Section 36, Chapter 23, Article 3. , in which the defendant assisted or participated, “the Arizona Bill states.

Murphy Bannerman of the Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona said that if the bill is passed, “it really forces people to make difficult decisions.”

“Either they have to travel out of state to get the care they need – they’ve seen that in Texas, and people have to go to the neighboring states to get the care they need, and it makes it difficult for those who do not have the resources to commute out of the state, ”she said told FOX10 Phoenix.

Several states see similar bills introduced as the national March for Life takes place on January 21 in the country’s capital.

“All human life has dignity and deserves equal protection under the law from the moment of conception,” Jeanne Mancini, president of the March for Life, said in a statement sent to Breitbart News.

She elaborated:

It is clear that this legislation is born of much frustration over the fact that states have not been allowed to debate and lay down policy on this highly controversial issue since the tragic decision in Roe v. Wade. We hope that the decision of the Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization will give the people, through their duly elected representatives, the opportunity to influence the laws of abortion.

Legislators in Missouri and Alabama also introduced “heartbeat” bills in December.

Idaho passed a bill last year equivalent to Texas.

The head of the pro-life caucus in North Dakota’s state legislature said it is likely that lawmakers will also take up a heartbeat bill in this state.

North Dakota State Senator Janne Myrdal (R) told KVRR in September that the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision not to revise Texas law at the time gave “a glimmer of hope” that judges could overthrow Roe v. Wade in Dobbs.

“It must be sent back to the states where it belongs,” Myrdal said.

In September, State Senator Jason Rapert of Arkansas (R) also proposed a bill that reflected Texas law.

With March for Life approaching, the American Life League (ALL) said in a press release sent to Breitbart News that it calls on the pro-life movement to “stop compromising.”

ALL observed Marchen’s founder, the late Nellie Gray, agreed with ALL’s zero tolerance approach to abortion and actually inspired EVERYONE to take this position.

In an interview aired in 1994 with EWTN’s Mother Angelica, Gray explained:

If you live with evil long enough… it’s the old, old thing. First, you resist it. Then you do not quite resist it anymore. Then you tolerate it a little, then you live side by side with it. Then you accept it somehow. This is exactly the incremental approach – if you accept a few exceptions and a little bit of abortion… then you are going to sit down next to it… And unfortunately, after 20 years now, these exception clauses are… that’s what we have.

Dwain Currier, Director of Public Policy at the American Life League, said This week, ALL has a “no exceptions” policy on abortion, claiming that exceptions “for rape, incest or any other reason – result in lost lives.”

“Such exceptions are exclusions that result in death, they represent the evil Gray talked about years ago,” ALL says, adding that the 49th.th annual March for Life, Currier and his colleagues will “call for an end to all abortions without exception.”

“If we really want to end the killing,” Currier says, “we have to end it all.”

Follow us on Google News

Disclaimers for mcutimes.com

All the information on this website – https://mcutimes.com – is published in good faith and for general information purposes only. mcutimes.com does not make any warranties about the completeness, reliability, and accuracy of this information. Any action you take upon the information you find on this website (mcutimes.com), is strictly at your own risk. mcutimes.com will not be liable for any losses and/or damages in connection with the use of our website.

Give a Comment